Empirical SCOTUS is a recurring series by Adam Feldman that looks at Supreme Court data, primarily in the form of opinions and oral arguments, to provide insights into the justices’ decision making ...

Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Amy Coney Barrett are each telling the public to read the Supreme Court‘s opinions on major cases for themselves, rather than rely on media coverage of the high court’s ...

Updated on Dec. 10 at 10:37 a.m. The Supreme Court on Tuesday considered a challenge to a federal law limiting the amount of ...

Book banning legislation chills speech, encourages teachers and librarians to soft censor, and demonizes content by LGBTQ+ and BIPOC authors. With accusations of obscenity, pornography, and material ...

WASHINGTON — Federal judges are frustrated with the Supreme Court for increasingly overturning lower court rulings involving the Trump administration with little or no explanation, with some worried ...

After an eventful summer of travel, teaching, and book tours, the Supreme Court justices are back—except it feels like they never left. Normally, we court-watchers and legal pundits digest the big ...

Norfolk County prosecutors reviewed confidential materials turned over from the federal government’s investigation of the Karen Read case for evidence that could benefit defendants in 19 criminal ...

Karen Read‘s civil case returns to court on Friday. A hearing is scheduled in Plymouth at 2 p.m. She’s facing a wrongful death suit from the family of her Boston police officer boyfriend John O’Keefe, ...

Witnesses claim she is "smearing and defaming" them after her acquittal in the high-profile murder case of Boston police ...

Book banning legislation chills speech, encourages teachers and librarians to soft censor, and demonizes content by LGBTQ+ and BIPOC authors. With accusations of obscenity, pornography, and material ...